rss
5

Protesting a ‘Chainsaw Massacre’

tree_MG_3635Surprised and alarmed by the removal of 10 large trees last week in the downtown area, residents expressed their anguish at Tuesday’s City Council meeting.

“Please stop the chainsaw massacre of the ficus trees in the downtown area,” said Pamela Goldstein, blunt in her entreaty. Ocean Avenue’s aesthetic appeal will take 50 years to recover, she said.

Seven of the trees in question had been deemed hazardous and slated for replacement as part of a routine sidewalk repair project, while three others fell under the ax as a result of a plan to renovate 222 Ocean Ave. into a restaurant.

Nine tree-lovers offered impassioned testimony lamenting the hewn trees, entreating council members to consider other tree_MG_3649sidewalk safety remedies and to give more public notice before removing any more.

“I never realized how emotionally attached I am to the green canopy,” said Barbara MacGillivray. Uneven sidewalks fail to outweigh the “irreplaceable landscape value” of the trees, she said, pointing out the felled ficus trees were planted in 1955, prior to Eucalyptus becoming the city’s official city tree in 1967.

“Can’t we talk about preserving this arboreal heritage?” she implored, earning applause for her subsequent suggestion that black banners be wrapped around trees doomed in the future to give residents a chance to intervene.

Ruben Flores, owner of Laguna Nursery, said that even though ficus trees were not his favorite, “they are here, and they are huge, and they give a beautiful mass of foliage.” He also raised a question about the city’s intention of replacing landscaping before summer, not the optimal planting season, he said.

“My parents actually moved here because of the trees,” attested Greg MacGillivray, who believes that people prefer Laguna over nearby coastal cities because of its visual beauty, owed in part to trees.

tree_MG_3655“These trees matter to me very much,” said Hallie Jones, a Laguna native now raising her own children here. “It pains me to see them go.”

Only Eleanor Henry defended the city’s action, describing her exasperation over routing wastewater lines every three months because of a root-invading ficus tree on her friend’s property.

In response to skepticism over safety issues, Mayor Kelly Boyd noted that the city has paid $300,000 in the past five years in settlements involving trip and fall claims.

Though city staff determined that the replacement of eight trees deemed hazardous did not require a design review hearing, council member Toni Iseman requested the project to be considered by the full council on April 9. At the time, Flores pointed out a rare eucalyptus specimen among those to be cut, which was spared.

The council voted to remove three other trees at 222 Ocean Ave. on April 23 when they approved permits for the property’s renovation.

All of the trees are to be replaced, though the species has yet to be selected.

On the subject of notification, City Manager John Pietig noted that the tree removals did come before the council, but Iseman pushed for better notification. While she intervened to place the sidewalk tree removal  project before the council, tree cutting at 222 Ocean Ave. moved ahead with little public notice. “People had no idea that approval of the historic building would result in the removal of three trees,” she said.

 

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • PDF
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • Digg
  • Google Buzz
  • LinkedIn
  • Yahoo! Buzz

About the Author

Comments (5)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. I couldn’t believe it when I happened to be walking on Ocean last week! Devastating! I wondered why on earth would they be doing that? Seems so senseless.

  2. mervyn jones says:

    Heart breaking to see these magnificent living things butchered in the way they were!! Have you no sense of decency? Have you no respect for other life forms? Shame on the people who authorized this disgusting action. And shame on those who carried it out to make a few bucks.

  3. Les Miklosy says:

    I read the principle argument for replacing these trees is the surface roots are heaving the sidewalks on Forest and Ocean Avenue, so I had to look for myself and inspect the sidewalk damage. On Friday morning I travelled the length of both Forest and Ocean, of the remaining trees I could not find a single example where these trees are doing such damage they warrant removal. In places where red paint marks the offending tree where damage only an over-zealous contractor could see, a little root trimming and re-paving by porous brick would contour the sidewalk at far less expense than tree removal.

    Our city better have a far better reason for replacing these mature trees than heaving sidewalks. These trees define the character of downtown Laguna, replacing them with a 15 gallon shrub will be a colossal blunder.

  4. [...] the wake of the backlash over the cut trees, dubbed a “chainsaw massacre” by one resident, Pietig said the successful collaboration on this issue may provide a blueprint for [...]

  5. tree lopping Liverpool

    Protesting a ‘Chainsaw Massacre’ – Laguna Beach Independent Newspaper, The “Indy” – Laguna Beach News

Leave a Reply




If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar.


seven − = 3