Laguna Beach Mayor Bob Whalen and Southern California Edison President Pedro J. Pizarro met face-to-face last week to discuss the public-safety risk of the utility’s above-ground power lines and to press for a plan to remove them citywide.
“We had a very good opening conversation to discuss how we could collaboratively address the ‘undergrounding’ of the entire city,” said Whalen, who was accompanied at the meeting Friday, Aug. 28, by City Manager John Pietig, Councilmember Rob Zur Schmiede, Fire Chief Jeff LaTendresse and Public Works Director Steve May.
During the meeting, city representatives presented a few proposals to Pizarro for review. In an interview Tuesday, Whalen said SCE officials agreed to study the options and reconvene in a month. “They will come back with alternatives and possibly other options, but it was a good first meeting and we are trying to find common ground,” said Whalen.
Cost and safety are the primary issues on the table from the city’s perspective. In July, after SCE equipment sparked a blaze in Laguna Canyon that set residents on edge, Whalen issued a statement calling the utility’s above ground lines a hazard. “We can no longer risk a major fire disaster caused by power lines, it is only a matter of time,” he said.
Whalen said he reiterated those comments at the meeting, pointing out that four fires within city limits had been traced back to SCE power lines over the last eight years.
As for cost, city representatives were looking for SCE to carry more of the financial weight of the “undergrounding” process, undertaken largely in piecemeal projects in neighborhoods that often take years and underwritten by assessments of individual property owners. “We no longer want to take an incremental approach and do a six year at a time neighborhood change. Our plan is to take a city wide approach, and we let SCE know that there are economies of scale and more efficiency in this plan,” said Whalen.
City staff have previously estimated burying utility lines citywide could cost $125 million, but Whalen indicated that the figure is probably closer to $150 million. “That is just an estimate though and could fluctuate,” he said. “That figure is not based on any detailed engineering.”
Just 40 percent of the town’s 10,900 electric meters are below ground, a staff report says. Some work is paid by utilities with funds required by the California Public Utilities Commission and the rest is paid by individual property owners. Over the past 25 years, 22 neighborhood assessment districts, comprising 2,200 properties, were created to underground their utilities, costing property owners about $45 million in current year dollars, Public Works Director Steve May said in a March 2014 report.
In July, Whalen called for a reversal of the status quo. “The city is willing to partner with Edison, but they should shoulder a substantial portion of the cost.”
In a statement in response to Whalen’s demands, an SCE spokesperson did not directly address the fire hazard issue. “Southern California Edison understands the interest by communities to improve neighborhood aesthetics by placing existing overhead utilities underground. The company operates primarily as an overhead electric utility, but will work with local governments and agencies when undergrounding projects are initiated and approved. There are pros and cons to placing equipment below ground and overhead. When providing service to our communities, safety and reliability is the primary concern for SCE.”
While aesthetic considerations motivate initiatives in town to rid streets of view-blocking power lines, Whalen said public safety is a more compelling factor. “The issue is not just with fire considerations,” the mayor said. “The poles on Laguna Canyon Road are so close to the road, that the city has counted 47 vehicular accidents as a result over the last seven to eight years.”
Firebrand Media LLC wants comments that advance the discussion, and we need your help to accomplish this mission. Debate and disagreement are welcomed on our platforms but do it with respect.
We won't censor comments we disagree with. Viewpoints from across the political spectrum are welcome here.
While everyone is entitled to their opinion, our community is not obliged to host all comments shared on its website or social media pages, including: