Coyote Trapping Contract Wins Approval

6
387
Share this:
Coyotes in nearby wilderness parks. Photo by Allan Schoenherr
Coyotes in nearby wilderness parks. Photo by Allan Schoenherr

Since baited snare traps were set in Laguna Beach last month, six coyotes have been captured and killed and sightings have dropped markedly, the city’s animal control supervisor said.

The controversial trapping plan will be suspended this week because animal control officers believe the aggressive animals that have invaded yards and even homes hunting pets as prey have been eliminated, supervisor Jim Beres said Tuesday, Jan. 12.

That same day, the City Council voted 4-1, with Mayor Steve Dicterow dissenting, to authorize a controversial $30,000 contract for trapping coyotes year-round. Beres said the service would be used “as needed.”

The contract was awarded to Critter Busters, based in Santa Clarita, which specializes in rodent and pest control and is state-licensed to trap larger animals, including coyotes.

In response to the decision, Wildlife Emergency Services, of Moss Landing, Calif., on Wednesday launched a petition asking the city to adopt “a more civilized coyote management plan.” The non-profit’s co-founder, Rebecca Dmytryk, told the Indy she made a bid for the city’s services.

She wasn’t alone in criticizing the city’s approach to coyote management during the hearing. Several people advocated the use of less lethal methods to manage wildlife, while others –including Council member Kelly Boyd and artist Scott Moore — described a disturbing change in fearless behavior among coyotes inhabiting neighborhoods in the last year and supported the city’s approach to deterrence.

Coyote street signs are popping up all over town. Photo by Charlie Craig.
Coyote street signs are in the Oak Street area. Photo by Charlie Craig.

Since July, the city has received reports of 83 coyote sightings or attacks on pets, police Chief Laura Farinella told council members. She outlined a range of measures undertaken to discourage coyote intrusions, which include signs in some areas to safeguard pets and educating residents about closing their doors and abstaining from leaving pet food outside.

In addition, Farinella authorized arming animal control officers with paint ball guns, rigged to shoot water pellets, to stun the animals. The department is also mapping their movements and adopting best practices used by other cities experiencing a similar problem, she said.

Despite the range of measures, the department continued to receive calls and turned to trapping “as a last resort,” she said, noting that a coyote bit a child in Irvine.

Beres declined to say how many traps have been set.

In the most dramatic encounter reported locally, Marty Fischer, of Oak Street, recounted her experience last November. “I’m scared to death. I saw a coyote come into my bedroom, through a door, grab my dog that was trying to protect a little person,” said Fischer, referring to a grandchild. “What if it wasn’t my small dog? What if it was a six-day-old baby?” asked Fischer. She conceded she erred by leaving a door open, but expressed support for what she described as the city’s “balanced” coyote deterrence plan.

Resident Judie Mancuso took an opposing view. “It is arrogant to think you can sanitize your environment by killing,” she said. Mancuso described protecting her pets by removing brush and a bird feeder to make her home less enticing to coyotes. Off-leash dogs that bite people are a bigger problem in town than coyotes, which haven’t harmed anyone in Laguna, she pointed out.

Carey Strombotne, a representative of the Laguna Canyon Conservancy, cited the town’s long-standing support for protecting wildlife habitat. Trapping “goes against what Laguna stands for,” she said.

“The city’s plan is inhumane and inefficient,” added Irene Bowie, a South Laguna resident and volunteer with Project Coyote. She urged the city to adopt an alternate approach, citing Project Coyote’s practices that involve coyote hazing and community education that she claims eradicated the problem in the cities of Calabasas and Davis.

In a later interview, Bowie expressed disappointment none of the council members asked for a discussion of scientific research on the subject. Scientists say trapping alone is ineffective, Bowie said. Reducing the coyote population, will lead to bigger litters, she said.

Moore, a 37-year Bluebird Canyon resident, described for the first time seeing coyotes near his home during daylight hours. “Things changed this year completely,” he said.

Both Boyd and Dicterow also described encounters with coyotes. “There is a problem in Laguna,” Boyd said. “We have to take the next step.”

 

Share this:
Firebrand Media LLC wants comments that advance the discussion, and we need your help to accomplish this mission. Debate and disagreement are welcomed on our platforms but do it with respect. We won't censor comments we disagree with. Viewpoints from across the political spectrum are welcome here. While everyone is entitled to their opinion, our community is not obliged to host all comments shared on its website or social media pages, including:
  • Hate speech that is racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic slurs, or calls for violence against a particular type of person.
  • Obscenity and excessive cursing.
  • Libelous language, whether or not the writer knows what they're saying is false.
We require users to provide their true full name, including first and last names, as a condition for comments. We reserve the right to change this policy based on future developments.

Scroll down to comment on this post.

6 COMMENTS

  1. It’s funny how the animal rights advocates rarely support their claims with peer reviewed data.

    If these were domestic dogs killing pets, few people would complain about the animals being removed. After all, the city is responsible for maintaining public safety.

  2. Irene Bowie is incorrect. Research is very clear. The only thing influencing coyote population is availability of food, water and a safe habitat. It has nothing to do with eliminating them. It has been proven and published by coyote experts, look it up.

  3. Absolutely disgusting. Shame on anyone who thinks that “trapping”, which effectively is actually slow torture, then gasing Coyotes or any wild animal for that matter is ok! Coyotes have a right to be here just as much as we do! If the residents weren’t so ignorant and stupid by leaving their doors open and letting their animals roam freely in areas they know coyotes hunt at, then there wouldn’t be an issue. I am a pet owner of two INDOORS cats and only go outside while supervised and never at night BECAUSE IM EDCUATED ABOUT THE RISK! If your trapping coyotes because they are a “problem”, then why can’t we trap some of these nasty bratty kids here in Laguna beach? They are 10 times more problematic then a hungry coyote who has been forced to hunt in town cause we humans are forcing them out of their homes because of over development. It’s a tragedy how low the human race has really gotten and how these disgusting people are able to feel good about themselves when they grab a suffering coyote out of a trap and watch it die as they gas them. Way to go heartless people of Laguna Beach who supported this atrocity, congratulations on turning your back on wildlife and becoming scum. I will go out and find these traps and dismantle them. And you better believe if i sustain any injury from these torture traps, Laguna beach had better lawyer up.

  4. Mr. Dupuie should consult an attorney before he decides to tamper with traps.

    Per CA Fish & Wildlife code

    §4009. Traps; Remove or Disturb
    It is unlawful to remove or disturb the trap of any
    licensee while the trap is being used by the licensee on
    public land or on land where the licensee has permission
    to trap.

    Not sure how much liability the city would face for your injuries while committing an unlawful activity.

    You would likely be on the losing side of any litigation.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here