Criticism of Village Laguna’s Spending Doesn’t Add Up

1
246
Share this:

Editor,

The truth seems to not mean very much lately to a few in Laguna Beach especially during this campaign season and I would like to take Howard Hills to task for his latest letter-to-the-editor where he states that Village Laguna spent “10 times over the opposition in 2012”.

Is he really serious? Because if he is, I hope his profession is not accounting. If it is, he should find another day job. It’s a matter of public record that Village Laguna spent $30,553.81 during the 2012 election campaign (look it up). According to Mr. Hills’ calculation, that would mean that Steve Dicterow, Bob Whalen, and Jane Egly had each spent no more the $3,055.38 on each of their campaigns. How ridiculous is that? Or did he mean the opposition collectively? That would be even more ridiculous especially in light of the current campaign.

By the end of September Robert Zur Schmiede and Jon Madison had over $50,000 in contributions and two others had over $30,000 and all had already spent between $20,000 and $30,000.

And just to keep the record straight, Mr. Hills, though Village Laguna was supportive of the Yes on Measure CC campaign, it was financed and carried out by the Committee for Measure CC, not Village Laguna.

It appears that in Hills’ desperate attempt to influence this upcoming City Council election, his fast and furious pen is running out of credible ink.

Voters should be leery of Hills’ advice on who to vote for City Council and instead vote for Toni Iseman and Rob Zur Schmiede.

Johanna Felder
, Laguna Beach

Share this:
Firebrand Media LLC wants comments that advance the discussion, and we need your help to accomplish this mission. Debate and disagreement are welcomed on our platforms but do it with respect. We won't censor comments we disagree with. Viewpoints from across the political spectrum are welcome here. While everyone is entitled to their opinion, our community is not obliged to host all comments shared on its website or social media pages, including:
  • Hate speech that is racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic slurs, or calls for violence against a particular type of person.
  • Obscenity and excessive cursing.
  • Libelous language, whether or not the writer knows what they're saying is false.
We require users to provide their true full name, including first and last names, as a condition for comments. We reserve the right to change this policy based on future developments.

Scroll down to comment on this post.

1 COMMENT

  1. I was referring to money spent on parcel tax. This splitting of hairs interests no one and does not merit a reply but let’s put it this way, we spent $3,000 and did one super accurate mailer that educated voters, not one disputable statement. In contrast, the Measure CC supporters in whatever incarnation did somewhere between 5 and 10 mailers and spent actually a lot more than $30,000, so my “10 times” estimate was conservative, and the Indy had to print a formal retraction for printing false information that Tom Osborne and the Canyon Conservancy or someone produced on the proMeasure CC website misleading voters to believe there were parcel size specifications in the ballot measure that did not actually exist under the language of the ballot measure. Come to think of it, maybe this is worth a reply, but then I would hate to seem “desperate.” People get the government they deserve. Desperate?

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here