Letter: Stop the No-Bid Trash Racket

Share this:

Most of us just received a notice in the mail that the city desires to raise our trash rates, usually a tiny blip at the bottom of our property taxes. Yet this dark and dusty fine print has allowed a 50-year-old rip-off to fester, costing Lagunatics millions of dollars. A quick internet search revealed the shocking fact that Laguna Beach’s solid waste monopoly has not been competitively bid since 1972. The simple effect is that without normal market constraints, Waste Management charges us three times the per-capita rate Irvine pays. They get away with it because Waste Management pays off the city with a fat kickback: Laguna Beach takes 10 percent of gross receipts, plus 25 percent of certain recycling profits. Basically, Waste Management overbills at our expense, enabling the city to get their hands on a portion of the solid waste fee revenue, which disappears into the general fund. The commingling of the fee revenues with general property taxes is problematic according to the California Constitution, prohibiting fee revenue from being spent on unrelated services. With Laguna Beach’s financial opacity, we have no way of knowing how our trash fees are being used. Waste Management makes a killing and keeps their monopoly, the city gets an off-the-books revenue source, and the taxpayer gets the shaft.

Now the city is asking for cost-of-living increases for the next two years. How can they ask for that when we are already overpaying on our base rate? City leaders have never put our trash contract to bid, so they can’t even know what the actual cost is, much less raise it an arbitrary amount. Ex-Waste Management employees have already testified to the Council that half-a-dozen other waste firms would love the chance to bid for our business, we just have to let them. Diligent financial stewardship of our public funds is a core pillar of safeguarding affordable housing in our community, especially when marginalized groups are already struggling to live here. The only way to preclude the council from raising rates is if a majority of property owners send a written protest to the City Clerk by the June 4 Council meeting. I ask all residents to protest this and future rate hikes until the council stops its no-bid cronyism.


Chris Moore, Laguna Beach


Share this:
Firebrand Media LLC wants comments that advance the discussion, and we need your help to accomplish this mission. Debate and disagreement are welcomed on our platforms but do it with respect. We won't censor comments we disagree with. Viewpoints from across the political spectrum are welcome here. While everyone is entitled to their opinion, our community is not obliged to host all comments shared on its website or social media pages, including:
  • Hate speech that is racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic slurs, or calls for violence against a particular type of person.
  • Obscenity and excessive cursing.
  • Libelous language, whether or not the writer knows what they're saying is false.
We require users to provide their true full name, including first and last names, as a condition for comments. We reserve the right to change this policy based on future developments.

Scroll down to comment on this post.


  1. We may pay a higher refuse collection rate than Irvine but we are not a city with a master plan layout of streets. Competitive bidding has its pluses and minuses. Speaking of monopolies what about Cox? But don’t get me started.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here