Letter: Proposed Village Entrance Structure a Costly Mistake

Share this:

After years of extensive community input and planning, the celebrated Laguna Beach Village Entrance is now a reality. The result is a magnificent, tree-entwined space whose attractiveness and scale fit neatly into the site as if serving as an extension of the rugged hillside that parallels it. Now, without any desire or commitment to solicit genuine public input, the Arts Commission is recommending that massive aluminum “mushrooms,” with their circus-like color palettes, be superimposed on this bucolic setting.

There’s no escaping the fact that at 70 feet in length, 45 feet in width, and 33 feet in height this is simply a faux building disguised as art. To suggest that it is out of character with the recently completed Village Entrance would be a gross understatement. It is simply too massive, too costly, and too contentious. Common sense suggests the project needs to be reeled in and reconsidered. The Arts Commission should start by acknowledging that the public has a right to weigh in in a meaningful, non-perfunctory way. After all, that’s how a transparent municipal government should work.

Like other structures of similar mass, the site should be staked so residents are afforded the opportunity to express their opinions about the project’s size, mass, and topographic compatibility. Because of the pavilion’s extraordinary length, girth, and height, the same staking rules required of those who wish to build or remodel should also apply to this project. The proposed pavilion’s visual and physical impact, combined with its immense price tag, is without historic precedent and warrants further scrutiny and a comprehensive citizen review. Should the Arts Commission reject this notion and continue to stonewall public participation only to fortify its predetermined position, the public should insist that the project be put on the ballot and residents be allowed to determine its fate.

Some on the Arts Commission have suggested that those who oppose this project suffer from a paucity of “forward thinking.” I would submit that nothing could be further from the truth. The creation of Heisler Park was forward thinking; insisting on a public park at the Montage was forward thinking; saving Laguna Canyon was forward thinking. Sadly, this project does not fall into that category.

As has been stated so eloquently by so many, this million dollar folly would be a gross mismatch and a costly mistake. It would be better to build nothing than to construct something so alien to the stunning canyon landscape. Simply put, this out-of-scale, Disney-like pavilion, does not embody the welcome we should extend visitors nor define the legacy we should leave our children.

Randy Lewis, Laguna Beach

Share this:
Firebrand Media LLC wants comments that advance the discussion, and we need your help to accomplish this mission. Debate and disagreement are welcomed on our platforms but do it with respect. We won't censor comments we disagree with. Viewpoints from across the political spectrum are welcome here. While everyone is entitled to their opinion, our community is not obliged to host all comments shared on its website or social media pages, including:
  • Hate speech that is racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic slurs, or calls for violence against a particular type of person.
  • Obscenity and excessive cursing.
  • Libelous language, whether or not the writer knows what they're saying is false.
We require users to provide their true full name, including first and last names, as a condition for comments. We reserve the right to change this policy based on future developments.

Scroll down to comment on this post.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here