Kudos to J.J. Gasparotti for keeping this issue alive. Many long-term Laguna residents are on a fixed income and, like the rest of us residents, approximately $2,000 of their property tax dollars are going to pay unreimbursed cost for tourists. It is projected that these costs will increase every year. Laguna’s public safety (police, fire, lifeguards) and other public costs are way out of proportion for a city of our size. Tourists are not good from a taxpayer standpoint. Isn’t the purpose of the City Council to use property tax income to the highest and best usage? The argument has been made that tourists support local businesses. In reality, Laguna taxpayers are subsidizing local businesses located on Laguna property owned by outsiders and run by outsiders.
George Orff, Laguna BeachFirebrand Media LLC wants comments that advance the discussion, and we need your help to accomplish this mission. Debate and disagreement are welcomed on our platforms but do it with respect. We won't censor comments we disagree with. Viewpoints from across the political spectrum are welcome here. While everyone is entitled to their opinion, our community is not obliged to host all comments shared on its website or social media pages, including:
- Hate speech that is racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic slurs, or calls for violence against a particular type of person.
- Obscenity and excessive cursing.
- Libelous language, whether or not the writer knows what they're saying is false.
Scroll down to comment on this post.