Opposed to Inclusion on Historic Home Listing

Share this:


I have read with interest the letters of homeowners whose objections to being included in the Historic Inventory have been largely disregarded.

I would like to add my name to the list of people who have a problem with their home being placed on the Laguna Historic Inventory list without permission and do not want to be listed.

I’ve owned several homes and rental properties in Laguna over the last 42 years. My current residence is K listed. I purchased the property in 1979 and at that time there was no historic inventory listing or Design Review Board. The house was a derelict house with broken windows and a weed choked yard. There were no homes being remodeled in North Laguna. (Times certainly have changed) I proceeded to remodel and replaced every window and door, taking the home down to the studs. The only original thing about the home as it stands today is the exterior chimney and some of the original fir floors. I have many photographs of the house over time as the home morphed with each new owner. There were many exterior design changes. This home is not architecturally original.

The home is historical because of the people who originally built the house. That is its historical claim, not the architecture. The original house’s long front porch and other architectural details disappeared over the years. By the time I bought the house that was all gone. This house “just growed” like Topsy. Every family wanted to put their mark on the home and over the years the home has changed and grown to accommodate its owners.

That should not change. Each new owner should be able to make changes to fit their needs that are consistent with the neighborhood and following the permit and Design Review guidelines.

We are being overzealous in listing homes. Why does Laguna need to list and categorize homes with a historic rating, when homes over 50 years old will automatically be reviewed as to their historic value when the owner applies for a building permit? We also have Design Review that is pretty thorough and responsive to concerns. Why do we need another layer of regulation?

If it is allowed to go forward, this listing of homes is additional regulation and an invasion and taking of property rights that will change your ability to make changes to your home. It will invite unnecessary added scrutiny, which is costly and time consuming. If this is finalized it does reduce the value of your property.

I do not want my home on the list. It is too problematic.


Pat Carpenter, Laguna Beach

Share this:
Firebrand Media LLC wants comments that advance the discussion, and we need your help to accomplish this mission. Debate and disagreement are welcomed on our platforms but do it with respect. We won't censor comments we disagree with. Viewpoints from across the political spectrum are welcome here. While everyone is entitled to their opinion, our community is not obliged to host all comments shared on its website or social media pages, including:
  • Hate speech that is racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic slurs, or calls for violence against a particular type of person.
  • Obscenity and excessive cursing.
  • Libelous language, whether or not the writer knows what they're saying is false.
We require users to provide their true full name, including first and last names, as a condition for comments. We reserve the right to change this policy based on future developments.

Scroll down to comment on this post.


  1. It amazes me that someone “driving by” any property feels they have greater privilege to forcefully regulate their “view of acceptance” over the right of a property owner.

  2. If the control freaks think certain properties are so important, they should buy them and do what they want. Otherwise, butt out! It’s none of your business. What part of “property rights” and “liberty” don’t these control freaks understand? I’ll bet most of them celebrated American freedom on “Independence Day.”


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here