Ranch Makeover Contested in Lawsuit

Share this:
Ranch hotel and golf course co-owner Mark Christy,succeed in winning development permits from the Coastal Commission, but the decision is now being challenged in court.   Photo by Mitch Ridder
Ranch hotel and golf course co-owner Mark Christy succeeded in January in winning development permits from the Coastal Commission, but the decision is now being challenged in court.
Photo by Mitch Ridder

Two months after the California Coastal Commission granted a coastal development permit to allow Laguna Beach resident Mark Christy to continue renovation of The Ranch, a neglected hotel and golf course in Aliso Canyon, the project has hit another potential snag.

Lawyers representing Laguna Beach resident Mark Fudge filed a petition with the Los Angeles Superior Court on Thursday, March 5, seeking to reverse the permit approvals for Christy’s project that were granted by the city of Laguna Beach Planning Commission and the California Coastal Commission.

Christy declined to comment on the suit, beyond noting that “the unanimous 5-0 city approval and 9-1 Coastal approvals should speak for themselves.”

Fudge’s petition asks the court to make a finding that the permit approvals were out of compliance with state environmental and coastal protection laws and the city’s general plan and to compel the city to require that the project undergo an environmental impact assessment and comply with building restrictions in a flood zone.

It also asks the court to bar the Commission and the city from further processing of the permit, and to forbid any ongoing activity at the project site that might physically affect the environment, and it seeks payment of attorney fees and legal costs.

Thanks to one of the conditions of the Coastal Commission’s approval of the coastal development permit, The Ranch will be responsible for their court costs and attorney fees if Fudge wins the suit.

The lawsuit by the Los Angeles firm of Morrison & Foerster names as defendants the Coastal Commission and its executive director Charles Lester, the city of Laguna Beach, the City Council, the Planning Commission and its chair, Anne Johnson. Laguna Beach Golf and Bungalow Village, LLC, owner of The Ranch, is listed as the real party in interest.

Christy received permit approval from the city’s Planning Commission last May to renovate the 84-acre Ranch. The project included refiguring the hotel’s 64 rooms into 97, a restaurant makeover and the addition of a spa and fitness center.

Construction of the project was slowed last year by Fudge’s initial effort to overturn the Planning Commission decision in an appeal that the Coastal Commission considered hearing last July. He contended the permits were unlawful by failing to weigh the project’s impact on affordable public accommodations, parking, historical and biological resources, water quality and other issues.

The Coastal Commissioners at that time agreed with their staff’s analysis that Fudge raised a “substantial issue” as to whether the permit approvals were consistent with the city’s adopted planning guidelines and portions of the state Coastal Act pertaining to public access. But the commissioners and their staff disagreed with Fudge’s contention that the city’s environmental review of the project was inadequate.

And when the commission held a hearing to review the project in January, Coastal staff laid out their finding that the project was consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act, which requires local agencies to identify the significant environmental impacts of their actions and to avoid or mitigate those impacts, if feasible. The Commission did not contest the city’s finding that the project was exempt from the requirements of CEQA and found that the project complied with the flood hazard provisions of the city’s certified local coastal program.

Now Fudge is suing the city and the Commission over those findings.

At the center of his lawsuit is his contention that because of the project’s potential to physically impact the environment the Laguna Beach Planning Commission should have required “appropriate CEQA review,” including preparation of an environmental impact report and an opportunity for public input, before issuing any permits.

Fudge also contends that the Coastal Commission and the city violated various regulations that deprived him and the public of due process in the appeal.

The City Council will likely be briefed on the lawsuit on March 17, according to City Attorney Phil Kohn, reached earlier this week. He also confirmed that the city and the Coastal Commission generally have 60 days to comply with a request to lodge their respective records of all related proceedings with the court, barring an extension.


Share this:
Firebrand Media LLC wants comments that advance the discussion, and we need your help to accomplish this mission. Debate and disagreement are welcomed on our platforms but do it with respect. We won't censor comments we disagree with. Viewpoints from across the political spectrum are welcome here. While everyone is entitled to their opinion, our community is not obliged to host all comments shared on its website or social media pages, including:
  • Hate speech that is racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic slurs, or calls for violence against a particular type of person.
  • Obscenity and excessive cursing.
  • Libelous language, whether or not the writer knows what they're saying is false.
We require users to provide their true full name, including first and last names, as a condition for comments. We reserve the right to change this policy based on future developments.

Scroll down to comment on this post.


  1. what does Mark Fudge have against Mark Christy? Mr Fudge is nothing more than nuisance and his continuing fight of an approved project that would enhance the old Ben Brown location is baffling. I hope the court tosses this frivolous suit and he is forced to pay for all legal costs that the city and Mr Christy will incur. Let it go Mr Fudge. Find something useful and productive to do with your time. Life is too short to hold a grudge.

  2. I have done my best to remain discreetly quiet re: THE RANCH. I assumed that common sense would naturally support a badly needed refurbishing of all the grounds at Ben Brown’s, not to mention the loss of income that OUR CITY, is daily losing. This fact is obviously evidenced by the cash influx of restaurants at The Montage, The Ritz, not to mention the alternate places for the golf sect to immediate relax in after playing Pelican Hills or The Monarch Bay courses. The owners are putting in a hefty financial investment not only because it should bring them a handsome profit. They’re also willing to take this large financial gamble because, at last, our town COULD have a truly high-class place of it’s own! One not owned primarily by outside companies and developers who … literally are here for the profits, alone. While these other 4-5 star places are wonderful, they are “chain-like”. When you go to a Ritz, or The Montage, you know beforehand what the experience will be like. However, there are certain towns along the coast, that each have their own, special, little local DIAMOND. Santa Barbara, Monterey, Carmel, San Diego, Cambria, etc… I don’t think this philosophy of individualism as happened by accident. Both residents and business leaders have worked with environmentalists to make the MOST of the elements unique to it’s surroundings, and to the local inhabitants who support it. Why does it always seem that a few local Laguna residents are only able to grasp their power of being negative…and saying “NO”! Is it so painful to support someone else’s ideas? Or to grasp the power to be affirmative? To see the POSITIVE changes we could ALL be a part of…simply by saying..”YES!” I hope we are ALL large enough individuals to keep our little LAGUNA JEWEL moving forward, with all of us as part of it’s powerful engine. We will, ultimately, all thrive, or stagnate, together. Let the residents of Laguna Beach finally PULL TOGETHER and support this new change that has come before us…let it represent OUR CHOICES, OUR MOTIVES, & OUR LIFESTYLES!

  3. Wow, this is sickening to read. Mark Fudge should be ashamed, and Mark Christy has my sympathy. This is the kind of bureaucratic nonsense that seriously dampens positive developments in our town. Just trying to fix up my house has proven to be a herculean task and probably qualifies as a second profession (I need my day job to keep up with all the fees), so I can only imagine what Mark Christy has dealt with. I would love to support a locally owned and operated golf establishment, and it seems like this would be great for our town on multiple levels. Hang in there, Mr. Christy–I’m rooting for you!


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here