City manager yanks developer’s controversial initiative to add city planners amid public concerns
By Daniel Langhorne, Special to the Independent
An unusual proposal from a local developer to donate $250,000 to Laguna Beach for hiring a new city planner or contract planning consultants was pulled from the City Council’s Jan. 22 agenda after a surge of concern from residents.
Residents packed the City Council chambers to comment on the pitch by Mohammad Honarkar’s Laguna Beach Company, which plans to file applications for about six major development projects in the coming year. Those projects, according to the agenda report, include the renovation of Hotel Laguna, the Laguna Arts District, the Heisler Hotel project, a Canyon Acres project, the construction of a 112-room hotel at South Coast Highway and Cleo Street, and “hopefully a project to renovate the movie theater.”
City Manager John Pietig’s decision to pull the proposal without public comment garnered groans from many of the residents in attendance.
“It’s clear that this item is misunderstood, because we don’t have the capacity in the Community Development Department to handle a number of applications for large projects at one time,” Pietig said.
The city employs about 10 planners who review a project’s compliance with the Municipal Code and the potential impacts on surrounding property owners and the public. Community Development Director Greg Pfost wrote in a staff report that his planners already have an “extremely heavy workload” handling initiatives such as the Historic Preservation Ordinance, Short-Term Lodging Ordinance, Major Remodel Ordinance, and Downtown Specific Plan and Action Plan.
If the City Council isn’t interested in accepting such a contribution, then the city will either have to pay for increasing demand for planning services through the General Fund or an increase in fees paid by all project applicants, Pietig said.
Mark Orgill, a Laguna Beach Company spokesman, said in a statement that the City Council agenda incorrectly used the word “donate” to characterize his company’s proposal. The Laguna Beach Company is instead interested in advancing a portion of the fees it expects to pay the city while it refines its Development Fee Program, Orgill said.
“We absolutely agree with developers paying to process their projects’ applications,” Orgill wrote. “It is standard practice to pay fees at various points throughout the development process. Whether we pay in advance or as we go, either way, we must pay fees, just like every other developer.”
Residents who attended Tuesday’s council meeting pleaded for the opportunity to share their opinions with the City Council, but Mayor Bob Whalen declined to let them because council members weren’t going to vote on it.
“Let’s wait and see what comes back and there will be an opportunity for everybody to review it and comment on it,” he said.
Kempf said she backed Whalen’s decision because the proposal was so unpopular among residents.
“I’m game to not talk about it tonight because we’re probably not going to do it,” she said.Firebrand Media LLC wants comments that advance the discussion, and we need your help to accomplish this mission. Debate and disagreement are welcomed on our platforms but do it with respect. We won't censor comments we disagree with. Viewpoints from across the political spectrum are welcome here. While everyone is entitled to their opinion, our community is not obliged to host all comments shared on its website or social media pages, including:
- Hate speech that is racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic slurs, or calls for violence against a particular type of person.
- Obscenity and excessive cursing.
- Libelous language, whether or not the writer knows what they're saying is false.
Scroll down to comment on this post.