Jury Still Out on Sugar and Breast Cancer

1
180
Share this:

Editor,

As a survivor, I applaud Dr. Darling’s article on nutrition, exercise and relaxation in regards to breast cancer prevention. However, I want to point out that the jury is still out on whether sugar causes or feeds cancer. The Mayo Clinic, MD Anderson Cancer Center and The American Cancer Society, organizations funding and conducting research to eradicate cancer, have published articles that sugar does not cause cancer. Sugar is vital to the growth of all cells, not just cancer cells. Studies also show that sugar deprivation does not stop cancer cells from growing.

When I was diagnosed with breast cancer, people told me to stop eating sugar. Chemotherapy was so difficult and devastating to my overall health that I started to find the comment offensive. If one can eat at all during chemo, it is a miracle. I don’t think sugar caused my cancer nor was it ‘a fluke’ because I am BRCA negative. I do think the fact that my maternal cousin, aunt and great aunt and I all had the same kind of breast cancer is more than a coincidence. Fortunately, researchers are working overtime to identify additional cancer markers.

I once asked my surgeon, Dr. Lisa Curcio, what made my cancer ignite and grow? While she thinks diet and exercise are important, she believes that stress and environmental toxins are causing the current increase in women’s breast cancer.

So if a piece of chocolate or a bowl of ice cream lower your stress, I say, “Go for it.” And if a friend of yours is diagnosed with breast cancer, don’t tell her to give up sugar. Bring her a healthy soup, a little cupcake and a funny movie. She needs comfort food and laughter as she battles for her life.

 

Christine Fugate, Laguna Beach

Share this:
Firebrand Media LLC wants comments that advance the discussion, and we need your help to accomplish this mission. Debate and disagreement are welcomed on our platforms but do it with respect. We won't censor comments we disagree with. Viewpoints from across the political spectrum are welcome here. While everyone is entitled to their opinion, our community is not obliged to host all comments shared on its website or social media pages, including:
  • Hate speech that is racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic slurs, or calls for violence against a particular type of person.
  • Obscenity and excessive cursing.
  • Libelous language, whether or not the writer knows what they're saying is false.
We require users to provide their true full name, including first and last names, as a condition for comments. We reserve the right to change this policy based on future developments.

Scroll down to comment on this post.

1 COMMENT

  1. Sugar had been linked to pancreatic cancer
    Sugar has been linked to lymph cancer
    Sugar has been linked to prostate cancer

    It’s safe to say sugar is linked to breast cancer and every other cancer out there.

    How do we know? The point in history when Britain removed tariffs on sugar is the point Cancer, Diabetes, Obesity, and fatty liver took off amongst the population. Research has already shown this.

    Scientists have also directly fed fructose to cancer cells and found they divide and multiply rapidly.

    Sugar is the culprit, that is a guarantee.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here