Look to Scholars for Parking Solutions

Share this:


I want to respond to the Indy’s article, “Trolley Use Dips as Congestions Remains Unchecked,” in the Nov. 10 edition. There are many issues in this article. I want to focus on Mayor Toni Iseman expressing her frustration over attempting to lure motorists to leave their vehicles in Laguna Canyon lots.

I want to suggest that city hall try to find new ways to solve our summer season carmageddon. For 40 or 50 years we have used one bucket of tools to no avail. So dear City Council, is it time to look in some other buckets? For example try Google Scholar / parking problems.

“Our downtown has been described as a ‘huge engine of communication’, analogous to a switchboard which ‘permits a wider range of alternative choices than would prevail under a more dispersed [suburban] arrangement.” The specific functions of the downtown have certainly changed in the two decades since Deutch’s analogy, but its ability to concentrate a select group of activities based upon its central location has sustained its importance to the well-being of the city. The costs of this ability are, however, substantial. This article approaches a problem eventually faced by most participants in central business area activities, automobile parking, and offers a framework for recognition and solution of this often misunderstood urban problem. How to fix our carmagddon is not a technical issue. Sorry to say it is a political issue. A final note: adding more auto infrastructure will not solve this problem.

Michael l Hoag, Laguna Beach


Share this:
Firebrand Media LLC wants comments that advance the discussion, and we need your help to accomplish this mission. Debate and disagreement are welcomed on our platforms but do it with respect. We won't censor comments we disagree with. Viewpoints from across the political spectrum are welcome here. While everyone is entitled to their opinion, our community is not obliged to host all comments shared on its website or social media pages, including:
  • Hate speech that is racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic slurs, or calls for violence against a particular type of person.
  • Obscenity and excessive cursing.
  • Libelous language, whether or not the writer knows what they're saying is false.
We require users to provide their true full name, including first and last names, as a condition for comments. We reserve the right to change this policy based on future developments.

Scroll down to comment on this post.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here